Analysis have been analysed playing with SPSS twenty-five.0. Basic detailed analyses were performed, including Cronbach’s alphas and you will wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were used to assess connections anywhere between gender, ages, sexual positioning, that have an enchanting/intimate companion, SNS utilized, sexting normalisation and willingness to take part in sexting just like the separate details, together with four sexting behaviors as mainly based variables. Nagelkerke’s R 2 try considered as a measure of perception size. All parameters was in fact joined to the model at the same time. The research has also been stratified by gender.
Incidence off sexting habits
The most typical sexting habits are receiving (21.2%) and having via a mediator (28.4%), followed closely by 3rd-group forwarding away from sexual blogs (nine.3%) and you can, finally, delivering (8.1%). Detailed statistics are shown into the Table dos.
New regression habits have been extreme. Nagelkerke’s R dos is actually .42 towards the “sending” design, .30 into “receiving” design, .23 toward “third-group forwarding” design, and you can .17 for the “searching thru an intermediary” design (Table 3:
On “sending” design, desire so you can sext (OR: 8.26; 95% believe period [CI]: 5.36-), having a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: 2.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: 1.19-2.93), intimate orientation (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: step one.04-step 3.00) and age (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: 1.step one4-1.63) was in fact notably related to sending involvement. On “receiving” design, having an intimate/intimate lover (OR: 3.dos7; 95% CI: dos.51-cuatro.28), determination to help you sext (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: dos.01-step 3.89), having fun with Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: step 1.16-3.10), sex (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: step one.37-2.41), using Snapchat (OR: 1.6step 1; 95% CI: step one.21-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.49; 95% CI: step one.20-1.86) and you can decades (OR: step 1.26; 95% CI: 1.12-step one.41) was indeed significantly associated with receiving involvement.
About “third-team forwarding” model, playing with Instagram (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: step 1.16-6.51), desire to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.48-dos.72), sex (OR: step 1.96; 95% CI: 1.32-dos.91), that have an intimate/sexual companion (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: step 1.29-dos.68), having fun with Fb (OR: step 1.53; 95% CI: step 1.03-2.26), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-step 1.87) and decades (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: 1.22-1.66) have been rather connected with engagement for the 3rd-class forwarding.
About “acquiring thru a mediator” model, having fun with Instagram (OR: dos.step 16; 95% CI: step one.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.84; 95% CI: step 1.52-dos.24), with an intimate/sexual spouse (OR: step one.7step 1; 95% CI: 1.35-dos.17), sex (OR: step one.4step one; 95% CI: 1.step onestep one-step 1.80) and you will decades (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-1.49) had been significantly about involvement in the choosing thru a mediator.
Intercourse variations
The fresh regression designs were significant. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 is actually .50 for girls and you can .41 getting boys to your “sending” model; .30 for girls and you can .31 to own boys to the “receiving” model; .18 for women and .twenty four having males into “third-people forwarding” model; and .14 for girls and you will .22 for people for the “finding thru an intermediary” design (Table cuatro:
Throughout the “sending” model, for women, determination to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), with an intimate/sexual lover (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: dos.27-9.09) and you may age (OR: step one.60; 95% CI: step 1.17-dos.20) were somewhat regarding delivering involvement. To have boys, they were readiness in order to sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-9.94), having an enchanting/intimate lover (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.59-cuatro.88) and making use of Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: step 1.32-cuatro.29).
Throughout the “receiving” model, for women esposa AsiГЎtico, willingness in order to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), using Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: 1.43-), with an enchanting/intimate lover (OR: step three.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.62; 95% CI: 1.13-2.33) and you may age (OR: step one.42; 95% CI: step 1.17-step one.72) was rather pertaining to researching involvement. Getting guys, they were that have a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), determination so you’re able to sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-3.41), using Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: 1.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.06-step one.86) and you can many years (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: step one.04-1.38).
