Relationship between sexting behaviours and you can associated characteristics
Analysis have been analysed playing with SPSS twenty-five.0. Basic detailed analyses were performed, including Cronbach’s alphas and you will wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were used to assess connections anywhere between gender, ages, sexual positioning, that have an enchanting/intimate companion, SNS utilized, sexting normalisation and willingness to take part in sexting just like the separate details, together with four sexting behaviors as mainly based variables. Nagelkerke’s R 2 try considered as a measure of perception size. All parameters was in fact joined to the model at the same time. The research has also been stratified by gender.
Incidence off sexting habits
The most typical sexting habits are receiving (21.2%) and having via a mediator (28.4%), followed closely by 3rd-group forwarding away from sexual blogs (nine.3%) and you can, finally, delivering (8.1%). Detailed statistics are shown into the Table dos.
New regression habits have been extreme. Nagelkerke’s R dos is actually .42 towards the “sending” design, .30 into “receiving” design, .23 toward “third-group forwarding” design, and you can .17 for the “searching thru an intermediary” design (Table 3:
On “sending” design, desire so you can sext (OR: 8.26; 95% believe period [CI]: 5.36-), having a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: 2.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: 1.19-2.93), intimate orientation (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: step one.04-step 3.00) and age (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: 1.step one4-1.63) was in fact notably related to sending involvement. On “receiving” design, having an intimate/intimate lover (OR: 3.dos7; 95% CI: dos.51-cuatro.28), determination to help you sext (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: dos.01-step 3.89), having fun with Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: step 1.16-3.10), sex (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: step one.37-2.41), using Snapchat (OR: 1.6step 1; 95% CI: step one.21-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.49; 95% CI: step one.20-1.86) and you can decades (OR: step 1.26; 95% CI: 1.12-step one.41) was indeed significantly associated with receiving involvement. Read More