(and just why he’s most likely wrong):
Why should he has got several other James in the event the earliest you’re nevertheless as much as? 1638 is believed getting the year from immigration; the only real entry in the Parish facts to possess a beneficial James Porter, man of John and Anna Porter, is actually for the one “officially” mentioned above that was Baptized 20 Feb 1627. Possibly that it time try signifying rather an adoption kind of point with anybody who John Anna leftover James that have when they decided to go to The united states, or he had been lso are baptized…? Only throwing content available to you.
Unlikely. Either the guy and Sarah was twins or Anna had intimate right back so you’re able to straight back pregnancies; maybe not in the Parish details, nor mentioned when you look at the John Porter’s tend to.
Perhaps their last son, however, if therefore, he have to have passed away more youthful as there is not any reference to a guy Joseph in the John Porter’s commonly – well, okay, okay, sure there clearly was, however, one “kid Joseph Judson” is basically discussing a boy-in-law, maybe not a physiological man – this might be most likely where in actuality the confusion been. One to background says Joseph was born in Felsted, Essex, England – the household is actually long gone by this big date, therefore if that is true, upcoming it Joily.
ANNA-HANNAH-BO-BANNA-JOHANNA-FlowerANNA-FO-FANNA-ME-MI-MO-MANNA-Rose!
Whenever reading through some Porter records and you may family relations trees, you will find particular certainly major dilemma with Anna’s name and some daughters and you may combination them all right up – there is certainly Anna and you may Flower, then there’s Johanna and Hannah, who’ve one another been known as Anna, leading to the fresh new dilemma.
Having Anna, while i first started enjoying the woman also called Flower, I believed that perhaps John Porter nicknamed Anna their “Rose”, with the moniker later on whenever naming one of its females. But, We unearthed that John got a sibling Flower, nowadays consider it actually was just a young error in which anybody perplexed Anna which have John’s aunt in the beginning and you can/otherwise after with the girl Rose, during the girl demise.
As well as, I believe their eldest daughter, Anna (Anna for each Parish info) and you can Johanna commonly noted on of numerous John Porter-Anna White records, was that while the same. Zero Johanna was mentioned during the early Parish facts. Unclear the spot where the identity Johanna originated (even though I’ve a concept lower than and is a fantastic mixing out-of mommy dad’s brands), in the desire (note: dos eldest daughters, Anna and Sara commonly stated from inside the John’s have a tendency to while they received the bit after they partnered), pursuing the two earliest sons, the youngsters was listed in birth order (basic people, upcoming lady), which have a keen Anna indexed past. In this case, as to why several other Anna? Encountered the earliest Anna been going by Johanna from this big date, so they really age once again, or was it usually Johanna, but mislisted in the Parish information? Did they phone call almost all their girls Anna. Did John establish his commonly themselves or was it transcribed because of the some one? I’m sure new youngest “Anna” is basically Hannah, and therefore sounds nearly the same.
Demands more search, but we know one to John Anna’s d Gaylord; Frequently, John Anna’s kid John had a man titled John which married an effective Joanna Gaylord, who was brand new Grandd Gaylord (so that they was basically cousins once they hitched); Even though a few generations from, brand new similarity when you look at the brands try unquestionable – my personal abdomen informs me this might be most likely where Anna/Johanna misunderstandings is inspired by.
IMMIGRATION
Outlined ship listings many of the early arrivals is not available for different explanations, but one particular grounds is as the getting a period of time during the Massachusetts Bay Colony’s Governor John Winthrop’s period, the guy made a decision to not need one listing of passengers and alternatively accepted just an entire amount. Their checklist entryway for around 1 September 1638 which taken into account 20 watercraft arrivals over one to summer was brief:
