Studies have been analysed using SPSS twenty five.0. Earliest detailed analyses have been did, plus Cronbach’s alphas and frequencies. Binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate relationships between intercourse, many years, sexual orientation, that have an intimate/intimate lover, SNS utilized, sexting normalisation and you may willingness to take part in sexting because the independent variables, additionally the four sexting behaviors since the oriented parameters. Nagelkerke’s R 2 are thought to be a way of measuring perception size. The variables have been joined toward model as well. The research has also been stratified from the sex.
Prevalence out-of sexting behaviours
The most widespread sexting behaviours get (21.2%) and receiving thru a mediator (28.4%), with third-people forwarding of sexual articles (nine.3%) and, finally, sending (8.1%). Descriptive statistics get during the Dining table dos.
This new regression patterns had been tall. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 is .42 into the “sending” model, .31 to your “receiving” model, .23 towards “third-cluster forwarding” model, and .17 to your “researching thru a mediator” design (Dining table step three:
Throughout the “sending” design, determination so you can sext (OR: 8.26; 95% trust period [CI]: 5.36-), with an intimate/intimate lover (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-2.93), intimate direction (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: step one.04-step 3.00) and you can decades (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step one.step 14-step one.63) was notably pertaining to sending engagement. Throughout the “receiving” model, which have a romantic/intimate lover (OR: step 3.27; 95% CI: dos.51-cuatro.28), determination so you can sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 2.01-step three.89), using Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: step 1.16-step 3.10), sex (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: step one.37-dos.41), using Snapchat (OR: step 1.6step one; 95% CI: step one.dos1-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.49; 95% CI: 1.20-1.86) and age (OR: step 1.26; 95% CI: step 1.step one2-1.41) was in fact significantly linked to receiving engagement.
On the “third-team forwarding” model, using Instagram (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: step one.1six-six.51), readiness in order to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: step one.48-dos.72), sex (OR: step one.96; 95% CI: 1.3dos-dos.91), having a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: step one.29-2.68), having fun with Myspace (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: step 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: step 1.09-step one.87) and you can decades (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22-1.66) have been significantly connected with involvement within the third-party forwarding.
About “searching via a mediator” design, having fun with Instagram (OR: 2.step one6; 95% CI: step 1.47-3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.84; 95% CI: 1.5dos-dos.24), that have a romantic/sexual spouse (OR: step one.7step 1; 95% CI: step one.35-2.17), intercourse (OR: step 1.4step 1; 95% CI: step one.step onestep one-step one.80) and you will ages (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step one.23-step 1.49) was basically notably regarding wedding into the acquiring via a mediator.
Sex variations
The brand new regression activities was in fact tall. Nagelkerke’s R 2 try .fifty for females and you may .41 getting boys towards the “sending” model; .31 for women and you can .30 to have boys towards the “receiving” model; .18 for girls and you may .24 having guys towards “third-class forwarding” model; and you can .fourteen for girls and you can .22 getting guys on “choosing through a mediator” model (Dining table 4:
Regarding “sending” model, for women, willingness in order to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), with an intimate/sexual companion (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: dos.27-nine.09) and you can many years (OR: step one.60; 95% CI: step 1.17-2.20) had been significantly about delivering wedding. To possess guys, they were willingness to help you sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step three.68-nine.94), that have an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: step 1.59-4.88) and utilizing Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.32-cuatro.29).
About “receiving” model, for women, determination to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), playing with Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: 1.43-), with an enchanting/sexual lover (OR: step 3.77; 95% CI: 2.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: step one.13-dos.33) and you may years (OR: step one.42; 95% CI: 1.17-step 1.72) were rather https://kissbrides.com/uruguay-women/rosario/ about receiving involvement. Having guys, these were that have an intimate/intimate mate (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.08-4.25), desire so you can sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: step one.58-step 3.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: step 1.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: step one.06-step 1.86) and you may years (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-step 1.38).
