This new habits exposure determined Kore kadД±n tanД±Еџma hizmeti by the Alcoholic drinks Use Problems Character Decide to try (AUDIT) try six
The first concerns throughout the epidemiological data had been the 9 issues regarding the Let survey. The new participants have been requested especially whether they got made use of the ingredients included in the new questionnaire. Dining table dos shows the employment percentages for every decide to try as well as the take to quantities according to you’ll differences between the fresh samples.
Men who were partnered, divorced, or coping with a partner every got a lesser Or than just those in an excellent LAT relationship (Otherwise partnered, 0
Desk dos shows that participants of Paramaribo said far more usually that they had made use of some sort of substance in past times-apart from cocaine, opiates, and you will unpredictable articles-than those inside Nickerie. In both examples, approximately 74% of one’s participants had made use of alcoholic beverages; forty two.6% inside the Paramaribo and you may 36.6% in Nickerie had used tobacco cigarette. They were plus the top ingredients.
4% from inside the Paramaribo and you may 5.8% when you look at the Nickerie. That isn’t a significant difference. Both in components, very respondents (regarding 93%) were not at risk (Audit score 0–7). A small grouping of on 6% got a moderate chance (Review get 8–15) and you can on the 1% a leading risk or most likely habits and you will punishment (Review score > 15).
Tables step three and you will 4 offer an overview of the possibility of dependency throughout the a few products towards the various other market classes. Inside Paramaribo, the risks for more youthful participants (11%) and also the male respondents (sixteen.5%) was basically somewhat higher regarding decades and you will gender. The brand new respondents towards the high degree had the lower risk (dos.9%) certainly one of most of the training account. Solitary and you will divorced anyone encountered the higher threats (ten.4% and you can 9.3%) getting civil condition and you can respondents which have an excellent Javanese record had the reasonable risk (step 3.2%) when comparing ethnic record. Brand new unemployed respondents in addition to handymen (one employed to perform unexpected residential solutions and you will slight reong this new occupations. Inside the Nickerie, i noticed three high differences: a man respondents had the highest exposure (15%), as the performed participants which have a combined background (15.5%). Individuals with an effective Javanese record met with the low risk (step 3.2%) therefore the participants doing work full-some time and the new handymen encountered the large dangers (10.1% and you may twenty-eight.9%). Inside next analyses, i determined one, regarding age bracket less than forty years, the risk of dependency involved 18.5% inside the guys and you will regarding 3% in women (inside Paramaribo as well as in Nickerie). In the age group a lot more than 40 years, the possibility of habits involved several.5% within the guys and you may throughout the 1.3% in females. The danger to have addiction is ergo including saturated in younger men, however in women.
We used univariate logistic regression so you can assess the odds rates to own dependency chance on such basis as degree peak, municipal updates, ethnic records, and you will activities for folks in elements. I noticed no tall variations in feminine for the of one’s kinds within the Paramaribo otherwise Nickerie. I did see a notably down chance proportion for men which have a keen Indonesian history (Or, 0.143; 95% CI, 0.036–0.574; p = 0.006) in Nickerie than in another teams. Men participants which have a lower life expectancy or supplementary studies level got good higher Or (Or for lower training, 4.971; 95% CI, step one.52–; p = 0.008; And second studies, 5.54; 95% CI, step one.64–; p = 0.006) than those which have a top education peak during the Paramaribo. 214; 95% CI, 0.084–0.0541; p = 0.001; Otherwise divorced, 0.269; 95% CI, 0.078–0.9362; p = 0.039; Or way of life to each other, 0.323; 95% CI, 0.124–0.843; p = 0.021).
The group variables are tall predictors from dependency exposure. But not, predictive stamina was lowest (Cox and you may Snell R square 0.096 and Nagel R rectangular 0.22).
