Age. (1952)
Jevons, Yards. P., and Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Roadway., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Meters. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Real time, I., and you may Nichols, A great. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, Good. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Meters. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you will Williams, Roentgen. Age. 0. (1958). step 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Yards., Plotkin, S. An excellent., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you may Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Yards. T. (1966). Inside the “This new Scientific Base of Treatments Yearly Feedback” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. School out-of London, The latest Athlone Press, London. Parker, M. T., Todinson, An effective. J. H., and you will Williams, R. Age. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
The new parasexual stage as well as include in genetic investigation
Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and you can Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty five, 116-123. Statement (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Report (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Statement (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Statement (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Yards. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Yards., and you may Asheshov, Elizabeth. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty-six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Yards., and Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., dos, 157-161. Ruys, A great. C., and you will Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you may Wilson, J. B. (1958). Have always been.step 3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Path. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Street. Buc
Tarr, H. An effective. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. A. (1965). Veterinarian. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and you can Dixon, W https://datingranking.net/de/beliebte-dating-sites/. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.
Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. O., and you may Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. E. O., and you may Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, R. E. O., Rippon, J. E., and you may Dowsett, L. M. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and you can Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, i, 647-649.
Hereditary Analysis when you look at the Micro-bacteria DAVID Good. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Introduction . 11. Segregation once the Evidence of Simple Genetic Control . A. New hereditary way of biology . B. Brand new identification away from segregation . 111. The foundation regarding Genetic Mapping . B. The sequencing from loci to your a good linkage chart: multi-factor crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Hereditary fine-build . E. Removal mapping . IV. Useful Hereditary Assessment . A beneficial. Popularity evaluating . Bplementation examination . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Analysis inside Eukaryotic Microorganisms . A beneficial. Standard considerations . 1. dos. Tetrad study . B. Genetic research in particular organisms step 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger and other “imperfect” fungus step three. Neurospora crassa . cuatro. Almost every other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . six. Filamentous basidiomycetes . seven. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Analysis in the Prokaryotes . A beneficial. General factors . step 1. Virility brands and you can conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and co-transduction . 3. Conversion and you may co-sales cuatro. Non-choosy investigation .
50 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Hereditary research specifically organisms step 1. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and other Enteric bacterium . dos. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you may Ps. putida . step 3. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor or other actinomycetes . 5. Almost every other bacterium C. Specialized mapping actions independent regarding recombination VII. Genetic Analysis in the Viruses A beneficial. Standard considerations . 1. Sorts of viral genomes 2. Features out-of virus family genes B. Hereditary analysis in particular viruses 1. Bacteriophages 2. Creature worms 3. Plant viruses VIII. Concluding Opinions References .
